AI vs the MARKET

Notes · Season archive

Season 1 — the $1,000 race (2026-06-12 → 2026-07-05)

The first season of AI vs the Market is over, and it answered its question more decisively than we expected — just not on the axis most people watch. This page is the permanent record: the final board, what each desk did, and why the whole race restarted.

The setup, restated

Six paper desks: three brains (Claude, Codex, and a deterministic quant that costs $0 to run) times two markets (penny stocks and crypto). $1,000 each, started even on June 12, 2026. Live quotes, honest fills with a 0.5% slippage haircut, one shared risk engine, no overrides — and every desk scored net of what its brain cost to think, at API list price. The full rules are on the methodology page.

The final board

Final snapshot taken 2026-07-05 at 9:58pm ET, between session waves — the numbers below are the season's official close, preserved verbatim in the archive. Codex brain costs are best-effort token estimates.

#DeskFinal equityGross P&LTradesSessionsBrain costNet
1 Quant · stocks $1,003.83 +$3.83 15 51 $0.00 +$3.83
2 Quant · crypto $1,000.00 $0.00 0 292 $0.00 $0.00
3 Codex · stocks $913.97 −$86.03 54 52 $43.29 −$129.32
4 Claude · stocks $871.95 −$128.05 37 51 $89.05 −$217.10
5 Codex · crypto $957.87 −$42.13 101 266 $214.27 −$256.40
6 Claude · crypto $970.12 −$29.88 81 267 $348.27 −$378.15

The finding, stated plainly

The two $0-cost quant desks finished #1 and #2 net. Every LLM desk finished net-negative — and most of the deficit was the thinking bill, not the trading. Look at the gross and net columns side by side: claude-crypto lost only $29.88 trading but $378.15 net, because it spent $348.27 deciding. Codex-crypto tells the same story at a smaller bill. At $1,000 a desk, an LLM paying roughly a dollar per session faces a cost headwind on the order of a third of the account per month. No realistic trading edge climbs over that. The race was decided by the meter, and that was the finding.

Desk by desk

Quant · stocks — the only desk that made money trading. Fifteen trades, +$28.41 realized on its closed trades, disciplined breakout entries under a SPY regime gate, and a $0 bill. Not a fireworks show; the win came from selectivity and free thinking.

Quant · crypto — 292 sessions, zero trades, $1,000.00. Its BTC trend gate stayed closed through an entire bear stretch (Bitcoin spent the season roughly 38% off its November high), so it never bought anything. Standing pat looked broken and was actually the strategy working: it beat every desk that traded. The most instructive contestant of the season.

Claude · crypto and Codex · crypto — they dip-bought a falling market and paid the biggest bills. Both traded actively (81 and 101 fills), both finished roughly flat-to-down on the trading itself, and both were buried by their session costs — the two largest thinking bills of the season. The lesson wasn't that they traded badly; it's that at this account size they couldn't out-earn their own meter.

Claude · stocks and Codex · stocks — churn versus selectivity. Codex traded more but lost less per decision and kept its bill smaller; Claude cut positions harder and spent about twice as much thinking. Both ended gross-negative in a tape where the free quant stayed green — same scan, same engine, different judgment.

Notable moments

Season 1 final race chart: all six desk equity curves from the even $1,000 start to the season close
The season, in one chart: six desks from one starting line.

What's new in Season 2

Season 1's full history — every trade, every session, every rejection — stays archived and reachable. Nothing was deleted; the scoring simply starts fresh at the season boundary.

Watch Season 2 live → Read the changelog

More: the methodology · the bill · all notes